When It's Not Allergic Rhinitis: Clinical Signs to Raise a Patient's Suspicion for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in patients presenting with the chief complaint of nasal allergies. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary care, academic center. METHODS: Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected from participants who were patients presenting with the chief complaint of nasal allergies. From all participants, a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) was collected, and a modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score was calculated from nasal endoscopy. Association was sought between having CRS and variables of clinical and demographic characteristics, SNOT-22, and endoscopy score. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were recruited and 91.3% were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis; 45.2% were also diagnosed with CRS. Approximately half of the patients with CRS reported no intranasal corticosteroid usage. Having CRS was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-4.04, P = .004), endoscopy score (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.59-2.42, P < .001), and the SNOT-22 nasal subdomain score (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.11, P = .001) related to SNOT-22 items: "need to blow nose," "thick nasal discharge," "sense of taste/smell," and "blockage/congestion of nose." At least moderate (item score ≥3) "blockage/congestion of nose" or "thick nasal discharge," mild "need to blow nose" (item score ≥2) or very mild decreased "sense of taste/smell" (item score ≥1), and any nasal endoscopy findings (endoscopy score ≥1) were statistically significant predictors of CRS. CONCLUSION: Moderate or more severe nasal obstruction or discharge symptoms, any decreased sense of smell/taste, or positive nasal endoscopy findings in patients believing they have allergic rhinitis should prompt further evaluation of CRS to avoid delays in treatment.

Qualitative Research Methodology and Applications: A Primer for the Otolaryngologist.

OBJECTIVE: Qualitative and mixed methods methodology is becoming more commonplace in otolaryngology as the field strives to understand more complex concepts of the ear, nose, and throat. This methodology can have tremendous utility in studies directed at patient-centered care by offering practical insights and granular detail-directly from patients-which may not be realized by quantitative approaches. METHODS: Narrative Review. RESULTS: This review focuses on what questions can be answered by qualitative research, the basics of the underlying principals and different methodologies utilized, and describes the pearls, pitfalls, and rigor of qualitative research. CONCLUSIONS: This understanding of qualitative inquiry is critical for the otolaryngologist to stay current on what is published and have the ability to include this in their research repertoire. Laryngoscope, 134:27-31, 2024.

Concerns regarding health-related social media usage amongst otolaryngology patients.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine concerns of otolaryngology patients regarding health-related social media usage. METHODS: A total of 372 otolaryngology patients were asked to report their level of concern (on a scale of "not at all", "a little", "somewhat", or "highly" concerned) regarding health-related social media usage as it pertained to risk of "loss of privacy or anonymity related to your health condition", "reliability of disease/treatment information", and "reliability of physician reviews/recommendations". Demographics and social media usage patterns (on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok or other platforms) were compared to concerns about health-related social media usage. RESULTS: The level of concern was highest for reliability of disease/treatment information and least for loss of privacy/anonymity (p < 0.001). Concern about loss of privacy/anonymity was associated with age over 25 years (OR = 3.12, 95%CI 1.66-5.86, p < 0.001) and negatively with daily use of Twitter (OR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.30-0.96, p = 0.035). Concern about reliability of disease/treatment information was negatively associated with Medicare insurance (OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.35-0.93, p = 0.024), which is available to adults aged ≥65 years, and concern over reliability of physician reviews/recommendations was associated with patients identifying their race as Asian, American Indian and other (OR = 3.16, 95%CI 1.22-8.19, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest concern about health-related social media usage is related to reliability of disease/treatment information, though notably less among patients with Medicare who represent adults of age 65 years or older. Concerns over loss of privacy/anonymity and reliability of physician reviews/recommendations are also prevalent and associated with patient demographics. These concerns may constrain utilization of social media for healthcare purposes, which highlights the importance of reliable sources of information.

Variability in Minimal Clinically Important Difference Calculation and Reporting in the Otolaryngology Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Best practices for calculation of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of outcome measures include the use of complementary methodologies (broadly classified as anchor-based and distribution-based) and reporting of the MCID's predictive ability. We sought to determine MCID calculation and reporting patterns within the otolaryngology literature. METHODS: A systematic search strategy of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases was developed and implemented to identify studies reporting the determination of an MCID for an outcome measure. Studies specifically within the otolaryngology literature (defined as journals classified as "otorhinolaryngology" in the Journal Citation Reports database) were included. All those journals were additionally searched for relevant articles. RESULTS: There were 35 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 88.6% reported MCID of a patient-reported outcome measure and the remainder were for objective outcome measurements. Anchor-based methods were used by 82.9% of studies and distribution-based methods were used by 68.6% of studies. Of all studies, 31.4% utilized anchor-based methods alone, 17.1% utilized distribution-based methods alone, and 51.4% used both methods. Only 25.7% of studies reported the sensitivity (median: 60.8%, range: 40.5%-86.7%) and specificity (median: 80.4%, range: 63.5%-88.0%) of the MCID to detect patients experiencing clinically important change. CONCLUSION: Deviation from best practices in MCID calculation and reporting exists within the otolaryngology literature, with almost half of all studies only using one method of MCID calculation and almost three-quarters not reporting the predictive ability (sensitivity/specificity) of the calculated MCID. When predictive ability is reported, however, MCIDs appear to be more specific than sensitive. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2023.

Patient perspectives on recall period and response options in patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology: An international multi-centered study.

BACKGROUND: Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use a variety of recall periods and response scales to assess CRS symptom burden. Global perspectives of CRS patients regarding optimal recall periods and response scales for CRS PROMs are unknown. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study recruiting 461 CRS patients from sites across the United States, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Austria. Participants chose which CRS symptom recall period (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, >1 month) was most reflective of their current disease state and upon which to best base treatment recommendations (including surgery). Participants also chose which of six response scales (one visual analogue scale and five Likert scales ranging from four to eight items) was easiest to use, understand, and preferred. RESULTS: A plurality of participants (40.0%) felt their CRS symptoms' current state was best reflected by a 1-month recall period. However, most patients (56.9%) preferred treatment recommendations to be determined by symptoms experienced over a >1 month period. The four- and five-item Likert scales were the easiest to understand (26.0% and 25.4%, respectively) and use (23.4% and 26.7%, respectively). The five-item (26.4% rating it most preferred and 70.9% rating it preferred) and four-item Likert (22.3% rating it most preferred and 56.4% rating it preferred) response scales were most preferred. CONCLUSION: Future PROMs for CRS should consider assessment of symptoms over a 1-month period and use a four- or five-item Likert response scale to reflect global patient preferences. These findings also inform interpretation of current CRS PROMs.

Impact of medical treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis on eustachian tube dysfunction.

KEY POINTS: CRS patients treated with medical management have improvement in ETD symptoms as reflected by lower ETDQ-7 scores However, appropriate CRS medical management may be limited in ability to significantly improve, or resolve, ETD.

Heterogeneity in the definition of chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: a systematic review of the scientific literature.

PURPOSE: Disease control is conceptually recognized to be an important outcome measure for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, inconsistent usage is a significant factor in disadoption of important concepts and it is presently unclear how consistently the construct of CRS 'control' is being defined/applied. The objective of this study was to determine the heterogeneity of CRS disease control definitions in the scientific literature. METHODS: Systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception through December 31, 2022. Included studies used CRS disease control as an explicitly stated outcome measure. The definitions of CRS disease control were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies were identified with more than half published in 2021 or later. Definitions of CRS control were variable, although 48.4% of studies used the EPOS (2012 or 2020) criteria to define control, 14 other unique definitions of CRS disease control were also implemented. Most studies included the burden CRS symptoms (80.6%), need for antibiotics or systemic corticosteroids (77.4%) or nasal endoscopy findings (61.3%) as criteria in their definitions of CRS disease control. However, the specific combination of these criteria and prior time periods over which they were assessed were highly variable. CONCLUSION: CRS disease control is not consistently defined in the scientific literature. Although many studies conceptually treated 'control' as the goal of CRS treatment, 15 different criteria were used to define CRS disease control, representing significant heterogeneity. Scientific derivation of criteria and collaborative consensus building are needed for the development of a widely-accepted and -applied definition of CRS disease control.

Chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: a review of the history and the evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Control is an important concept and outcome measure for chronic incurable diseases, defined as the extent to which manifestations of a disease are within acceptable limits. Control reflects a global metric of disease status and serves as the goal of treatment. This review will encompass the history of the disease control concept applied to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and the body of scientific literature that has focused on the definition of CRS disease control. AREAS COVERED: A review of the scientific literature identified historical studies and guidelines that have developed definitions of CRS disease control, as well as recent studies identifying the most significant determinants of CRS control. A particular focus was made on studies that investigated patients' and physicians' perspectives of CRS control. EXPERT OPINION: Patients and physicians have well-aligned perspectives about the definition, criteria, and application of CRS disease control, with a specific prioritization of patients' assessments of their own CRS control, as well as the symptoms of nasal obstruction and nasal drainage. The development of future guidelines for assessing CRS control must be based on criteria supported by evidence as essential to the assessment of CRS control but should also be the subject of broad international consensus.

Determinants of physician assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis disease control using EPOS 2020 criteria and the importance of incorporating patient perspectives of disease control.

BACKGROUND: We identify chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) manifestations associated with how rhinologists assess CRS control, with a focus on patient perspectives (patient-reported CRS control). METHODS: Fifteen rhinologists were provided with real-world data from 200 CRS patients. Participating rhinologists first classified patients' CRS control as "controlled," "partly controlled," and "uncontrolled" using seven CRS manifestations reflecting European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) CRS control criteria (nasal obstruction, drainage, impaired smell, facial pain/pressure, sleep disturbance, use of systemic antibiotics/corticosteroids in past 6 months, and nasal endoscopy findings) and patient-reported CRS control. They then classified patients' CRS control without knowledge of patient-reported CRS control. Interrater reliability and agreement of rhinologist-assessed CRS control with patient-reported CRS control and EPOS guidelines were determined. RESULTS: CRS control classification with and without knowledge of patient-reported CRS control was highly consistent across rhinologists (κw  = 0.758). Rhinologist-assessed CRS control agreed with patient-reported CRS control significantly better when rhinologists had knowledge of patient-reported CRS control (κw  = 0.736 vs. κw  = 0.554, p < 0.001). Patient-reported CRS control, nasal obstruction, drainage, and endoscopy findings were most strongly associated with rhinologists' assessment of CRS control. Rhinologists' CRS control assessments weakly agreed with EPOS CRS control guidelines with (κw  = 0.529) and without (κw  = 0.538) patient-reported CRS control. Rhinologists classified CRS as more controlled than EPOS guidelines in almost 50% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study directly demonstrates the importance of patient-reported CRS control as a dominant influence on rhinologists' CRS control assessment. Knowledge of patient-reported CRS control may better align rhinologists' CRS control assessments and treatment decisions with patients' perspectives.

Determinants of impact factor and Eigenfactor score in otolaryngology journals.

Objective: This study aims to identify determinants of high impact, measured by Impact Factor (IF) and Eigenfactor score, among otolaryngology journals. Methods: Bibliometric data of "otorhinolaryngology" journals were collected from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) database. For the years 2009-2020, we collected normalized Eigenfactor score, 5-year IF, immediacy index, fraction of IF from journal-self citation, proportion and magnitude of published citable articles, and total citation counts. High-IF and -Eigenfactor journals were considered those within the top-quartile of that metric each respective year. Results: High-IF and -Eigenfactor otolaryngology journals displayed higher 5-year IFs, immediacy indexes, and IF without self-citation (p < .05 for all years) including total citations counts and citable articles when ranked by Eigenfactor (p < .05 for all years). Otolaryngology IF correlated with 5-year IF and immediacy index within the same year (p < .05 for all years) and from previous years (p < .05 for all years; p < .05 for 2017-2018; p > .05 for 2009-2016). Eigenfactor correlated with 5-year IF, total citation counts, and citable articles within the same year (p < .05 for all years) and previous years (p < .05 for 2013-2018). Multilinear regression revealed that 5-year IF (p < .05 for 2009-2018) and immediacy index from the prior 2 years (p < .05 for 2017-2018; p > .05 for 2009-2016) predicted 2019 IF. Similarly, 5-year IF, total citation counts, and citable articles (p < .05 for 2013-2018) predicted 2019 Eigenfactor score. Conclusion: Sustained publication of impactful articles is the dominant driver of high IF and Eigenfactor score. Eigenfactor score reflects a unique evaluation of otolaryngology journals; ranking otolaryngology journals by their Eigenfactor scores significantly alters journal ranking compared to ranking by IF. Level of evidence: NA.

The Burden of Migraine on Quality of Life in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of comorbid migraine on quality of life (QOL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: A total of 213 adult patients with CRS were recruited. All participants completed the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), from which total and validated nasal, ear/facial pain, sleep, and emotional subdomain scores were calculated, and the 5-dimension EuroQol general health questionnaire (EQ-5D), from which the visual analogue scale (VAS) and health utility value (HUV) were calculated. The presence of comorbid migraine was determined by a score of ≥4 on the 5-item Migraine Screen Questionnaire (MS-Q). RESULTS: Of the participants, 36.2% were screened positive for having comorbid migraine. The mean SNOT-22 score was 64.9 (SD: 18.7) in participants with migraine and 41.5 (SD: 21.1) in participants without migraine (p < 0.001). The mean EQ-5D VAS and HUV were 60.2 (SD: 21.9) and 0.69 (SD: 0.18), respectively, in participants with migraine and 71.4 (SD: 19.4) and 0.84 (SD: 0.13), respectively, in participants without migraine (p < 0.001 for both). Higher ear/facial pain (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.36, p < 0.001) and sleep (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18, p = 0.002) SNOT-22 subdomain scores were positively associated with migraine. The SNOT-22 item scores related to dizziness, reduced concentration, and facial pain, in descending order, were most associated with migraine. The presence of nasal polyps (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.80, p = 0.020) was negatively associated with migraine. CONCLUSION: Comorbid migraine may be relatively common amongst CRS patients, and its presence is associated with significantly worse QOL. Dizziness as a symptom in CRS patients may be particularly indicative of migraine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3279-3284, 2023.

Defining 'control' of chronic rhinosinusitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Control is a global disease metric defined as the extent to which manifestations of a disease are within acceptable limits. Control serves as the goal of treatment for chronic diseases, such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), that cannot be cured. The objective of this review is to summarize recommendations for assessment of CRS control with a specific focus on how these recommendations align with patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives of CRS control. RECENT FINDINGS: Several staging systems for CRS control have been developed with the first and most widely recognized by the 2012 European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps, which was developed through expert opinion. Patients' and providers'/guideline-based assessments of CRS control frequently do not align. Patients understand the concept of CRS control and their assessment is dominated by the perceived severity of nasal symptoms. In comparison, providers' and guideline-based assessments of control are more global, incorporating nasal and extra-nasal symptoms, need for systemic antibiotics and corticosteroids, and nasal endoscopy. SUMMARY: Although more research is needed, future development of CRS control criteria through consensus around explicitly determined perspectives of healthcare providers and patients may one day serve as the foundation for a standardized approach to treatment of CRS.

Minimal Radiographic Mucosal Thickness or Opacification Criterion for Sinus-Specific Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: Primary chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is typically a diffuse process and the extent of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) performed for medically recalcitrant CRS is impacted by many factors. However, some third-party payors have implemented policies to authorize coverage for ESS in a sinus-by-sinus manner based on a minimal measurement of millimeters of mucosal thickening or sinus opacification in the corresponding sinus that is being surgically addressed. Our objective was to determine whether such policies are based on scientific evidence that in patients with medically recalcitrant CRS, a minimum measurement of mucosal thickening or sinus opacification is a predictor of CRS in that sinus or improved outcomes after ESS on a sinus-by-sinus basis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, from inception through May 2022. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. RESULTS: We identified 6070 abstracts which were screened and from which 112 studies ultimately underwent a full-text review. From these studies, we found that none investigated (or provided evidence of) whether any minimal degree of radiographic mucosal thickening or sinus opacification predicted CRS or better outcomes after ESS in a sinus-specific manner. CONCLUSION: We were unable to find evidence supporting a minimum millimeter measurement of mucosal thickening or sinus opacification as predictors of CRS or better post-ESS outcomes in a sinus-specific manner in patients with medically recalcitrant CRS. The extent of ESS for CRS should be determined through personalized medical decision-making that considers all patient-specific factors.

Anterior occipital condyle screw placement through the endonasal corridor: proof of concept study with cadaveric analysis.

PURPOSE: Odontoidectomy for ventral compressive pathology may result in O-C1 and/or C1-2 instability. Same-stage endonasal C1-2 spinal fusion has been advocated to eliminate risks associated with separate-stage posterior approaches. While endonasal methods for C1 instrumentation and C1-2 trans-articular stabilization exist, no hypothetical construct for endonasal occipital instrumentation has been validated. We provide an anatomic description of anterior occipital condyle (AOC) screw endonasal placement as proof-of-concept for endonasal craniocervical stabilization. METHODS: Eight adult, injected cadaveric heads were studied for placing 16 AOC screws endonasally. Thin-cut CT was used for registration. After turning a standard inferior U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap endonasally, 4 mm × 22 mm AOC screws were placed with a 0° driver using neuronavigation. Post-placement CT scans were obtained to determine: site-of-entry, measured from the endonasal projection of the medial O-C1 joint; screw angulation in sagittal and axial planes, proximity to critical structures. RESULTS: Average site-of-entry was 6.88 mm lateral and 9.74 mm rostral to the medial O-C1 joint. Average angulation in the sagittal plane was 0.16° inferior to the palatal line. Average angulation in the axial plane was 23.97° lateral to midline. Average minimum screw distances from the jugular bulb and hypoglossal canal were 4.80 mm and 1.55 mm. CONCLUSION: Endonasal placement of AOC screws is feasible using a 0° driver. Our measurements provide useful parameters to guide optimal placement. Given proximity of hypoglossal canal and jugular bulb, neuronavigation is recommended. Biomechanical studies will ultimately be necessary to evaluate the strength of AOC screws with plate-screw constructs utilizing endonasal C1 lateral mass or C1-2 trans-articular screws as inferior fixation points.

Patient Perspectives on Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are currently defined as a transient worsening of symptoms that return to baseline. This definition is narrow and can only be made retrospectively. The literature has studied this phenomenon from the physician perspective, yet a key stakeholder's-the patient's perspective is not well elucidated in the literature. To understand AECRS from the patient's perspective, we performed this study to further clarify this phenomenon. STUDY DESIGN: Basic qualitative study via patient interviews using constant comparative methodology was conducted. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. METHODS: Two of the authors served as coders, and via group discussion, a common codebook was created and used to identify recurrent themes. The themes were analyzed for meaning and conclusions were summarized. RESULTS: Ten interviews were conducted with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients. Recurring themes included the following: (1) patients identify with the term flare or sinus infection more than exacerbation; (2) consistent with the current definition, patients identify AECRS by worsening sinonasal symptoms but also relate secondary symptoms, including poor sleep, fatigue, exacerbation of lower respiratory tract symptoms, and malaise to AECRS; and (3) patients are greatly affected by AECRS via decreased quality of life (QOL), worsening of general health, and decreasing productivity. CONCLUSION: Beyond worsening of sinonasal symptoms, the concept of AECRS reflects a more complex construct to patients with associated extranasal symptoms and systemic manifestations. In addition, AECRS have a large impact on patients, and therefore, understanding this component of CRS is pivotal in improving disease control and QOL in this patient population.

Surveying the Landscape of Social Media Usage for Health Care by Otolaryngology Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with social media usage for finding a doctor or seeking medical advice among otolaryngology patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 361 patients visiting our clinics. All participants were asked if they were aware social media may be used to find doctors and if they had ever done so, and also if they were aware social media could be used to get advice about a medical condition or its treatment and if they had ever done so. Demographic characteristics were examined for association with affirmative answers to these questions. RESULTS: Facebook was the most used social media platform with 50.7% using Facebook daily. Over 50% of participants were aware social media could be used to find a doctor or seek medical advice. Daily use of Facebook was associated with using social media for finding a doctor (OR = 2.57, 95%CI: 1.41-4.67, p = 0.002) and seeking medical advice (OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.09-2.71, p = 0.020). Having Medicare was associated with using social media to find a doctor (OR = 2.20, 95%CI: 1.15-4.21, p = 0.017), whereas Medicaid was associated with using social media for medical advice (OR = 1.99, 95%CI: 1.08-3.67, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: A majority of otolaryngology patients may be aware of health care applications of social media, with Facebook being the dominant platform, and Medicare insurance identifying patients who may most use social media in this manner. There is also an indication that social determinants of health, as reflected by Medicaid insurance, may be associated with using social media to seek medical advice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 133:2116-2121, 2023.

The Impact of C1 Anterior Arch Preservation on Spine Stability After Odontoidectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Odontoidectomy for symptomatic irreducible ventral brainstem compression at the craniovertebral junction may result in spine instability requiring subsequent instrumentation. There is no consensus on the importance of C1 anterior arch preservation in prevention of iatrogenic instability. We conducted a systematic review of the impact of C1 anterior arch preservation on postodontoidectomy spine stability. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies of patients undergoing odontoidectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses were performed to compare spine stability between C1 anterior arch preservation versus removal and posttreatment outcomes between transoral approaches (TOAs) versus endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). RESULTS: We included 27 studies comprising 462 patients. The most common lesions were basilar invagination (73.3%) and degenerative arthritis (12.6%). Symptoms included myelopathy (72%) and neck pain (43.9%). Odontoidectomy was performed through TOA (56.1%) and EEA corridors (34.4%). The C1 anterior arch was preserved in 16.7% of cases. Postodontoidectomy stabilization was performed in 83.3% patients. Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0.1-145). Rates of spine instability were significantly lower (P = 0.004) when the C1 anterior arch was preserved. Postoperative clinical improvement and pooled complications were reported in 78.8% and 12.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant differences between TOA and EEA (P = 0.892; P = 0.346). Patients undergoing EEA had significantly higher rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Odontoidectomy is safe and effective for treating craniovertebral junction lesions. Preservation of the C1 anterior arch seems to improve maintenance of spine stability. TOA and EEA show comparable outcomes and complication rates.

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis: The current state of knowledge.

Objectives: Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are distinct from baseline symptomatology related to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this review, we seek to examine the literature on AECRS to synthesize the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and impact of AECRS on CRS patients. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of the scientific literature, identified by searching PubMed from inception through April 2022, was performed. Results: AECRS is defined in consensus guidelines as a worsening of chronic sinus disease symptomatology, with a return to baseline, typically after intervention with systemic antibiotics and/or corticosteroids. The working definition used across the literature, however, is broad and heterogeneous. The pathophysiology of AECRS is incompletely understood but is hypothesized to include an interplay of environmental and patient-specific factors. AECRS have been found to have a negative impact on quality-of-life measures, independent of baseline CRS symptomatology, and impact how patients and physicians view overall disease control. Treatment for AECRS includes oral antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids, although their efficacy for AECRS is unclear. Appropriate use of medical and surgical treatment for CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS. Conclusions: AECRS are a distinct entity in CRS patients and should be independently assessed when evaluating patients for CRS control. The efficacy of systemic medication usage for AECRS is currently unclear, but appropriate medical management of baseline CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS. More research is needed to further understand this phenomenon, including a more precise and prospective definition, defined epidemiology, and how to appropriately treat. Level of Evidence: 5.

C1 Lateral Mass Screw Placement Through Endonasal Corridor for Purpose of O-C1 Fusion: Morphometric Analysis in Cadaveric Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Odontoidectomy may pose some risks for O-C1 and/or C1-C2 instability, with previous authors reporting techniques for endonasal C1-C2 fusion. However, no technique for endonasal O-C1 fusion currently exists. We sought to describe the feasibility of endonasal anterior C1 (AC1) screw placement for endonasal O-C1 fusion. METHODS: Seven adult cadaveric heads were studied for endonasal placement of 14 C1 screws. Using thin-cut computed tomography (CT)-based "snapshot" neuronavigation assistance, 4 mm x 22 mm screws were placed in the C1 lateral mass using a 0° driver. Post-placement CT scans were obtained to determine site-of-entry measured from C1 anterior tubercle, screw angulation in axial and sagittal planes, and screw proximity to the central canal and foramen transversarium. RESULTS: Average site-of-entry was 16.57 mm lateral, 2.23 mm rostral, and 5.53 mm deep to the anterior-most portion of the C1 ring. Average axial angulation was 19.49° lateral to midline, measured at the C1 level. Average sagittal angulation was 13.22° inferior to the palatal line, measured from the hard palate to the opisthion. Bicortical purchase was achieved in 11 screws (78.6%). Partial breach of the foramen transversarium was observed in 2 screws (14.3%), violation of the O-C1 joint space in 1 (7.1%), and violation of the central canal in 0 (0%). Average minimum screw distances from the unviolated foramen transversaria and central canal were 1.97 mm and 4.04 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Navigation-assisted endonasal placement of AC1 screws is feasible. Additional studies should investigate the biomechanical stability of anterior C1 screw-plating systems, with anterior condylar screws as superior fixation point, compared to traditional posterior O-C1 fusion.